Hey everyone!
This will probably be my final blog post, sorry to say! But
it’s about love, so that should make up for it.
I had a hard time picking this week’s Rush song. They have
quite a few songs about love, but not a whole lot about actually falling in
love. Neil Peart has mentioned before that he’s not a huge fan of writing about
a concept as clichéd as love. But “Ghost of a Chance” is about falling in love with
your “soul mate” despite the odds being completely against ever encountering
him or her.
Zajonc (1968) discovered a fascinating concept called the mere exposure effect: that repeated
exposure to a stimulus will cause someone to like it more. The stimulus can be
more or less anything: a number, a picture, a person. And you don’t have to be
aware of it, either. If the stimulus is presented subliminally, the effect
still works. For example, if I show you a particular foreign word several
times, for a few milliseconds each time, you’ll likely prefer that word if I
later ask you to rate a few different words that you’ve “never seen before.”
This applies to music, too. I have several stories about
this effect in regards to music, but I’ll have mercy on you, dear reader, and
only share my most salient memories.
I’ve seen this one band a few times (surprise! It’s Rush),
and on their 2011 tour they played a couple songs off the album they were still
working on at the time. And it was the most fascinating thing to me: As soon as
they said “We’re gonna give you a taste of our new album,” about 15% of the
audience just left to get another beer or whatever. On the tour after that
album was released, the same thing happened! After intermission they started
playing half of the new album, and multiple people around us left and never
came back.
This is an example of how repeated exposure to a song causes
you to like it more. People go to a concert to hear the band play their hit
singles, not their new stuff with hopefully-trendy acronym song titles!
Another memorable example for me is when another band I
love, Muse, released a new single from their upcoming album. They started out
as a Radiohead clone, but quickly became known for some wonderfully
over-the-top prog rock songs. But then last semester, they released “Madness”
to the world.
I’d never seen a song have such a polarizing effect on its
audience. People left comments in the YouTube videos about how they would never
listen to Muse again, and others left comments saying that they would never
listen to Muse’s old stuff again. At
first, I was not a fan of the song. It was too minimalistic and dancelike for
me. As a drummer, I typically need the song to have an interesting drum part
for it to keep my attention. But over
repeated listens, I started to notice some of the subtlety to it, like the
guitar in the second verse. And every time I heard it, I started to like it
more.
My roommate felt the same way. So did everyone else I talked
to who had listened to the band enough to know how different this song was from
their usual style. I think it took an average of four listens to actually start
to like the song, aside from my girlfriend who liked it instantly. I still find
myself liking it more every time I hear it.
I need to figure out how that trick works.
—————————————
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Monograph Supplement, 9(2), 1–27.
(n = 604 words)
While I am no stranger to liking songs more and more the more I listen to them, I would like to drive home a very important point: FOR THE MERE EXPOSURE EFFECT TO WORK THE INITIAL STIMULUS MUST BE POSITIVE OR NEUTRAL.
ReplyDeleteFor me, with Madness, I had an EXTREMELY negative impression of it when I first heard it. Therefore, the mere exposure effect did not occur and I just grew more and more resentful of that godforsaken song. Anyways, glad you were able to enjoy it eventually. It is nice to know that somewhere, somehow, someone is cancelling out my deep-seated and completely justifiable hatred of that song.